Re: read_processs_output on closing network servers

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 8/15/05, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:

> So it never returns from the recvfrom call?

That's it.

> Is this actually the only time you see emacs hanging there?

Yes.

> I would guess that if it can hang in that case, you can device other
> cases (combining more processes) that would make it hang there in case
> any process changes state...

Perhaps, but I don't know of any other case. I will report any I find,
of course.

> In what way is the network server process closed?

By calling `delete-process'.

> I agree that using delete-process should not call read_process_output
> for the deleted process.  I just installed a change to avoid that.

Yeah, thanks!

Now, if you can shed some light on the other big problem with network
processes on Windows...  :-)

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u