[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:11:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:
> and leaks memory. If the path is 400, you do 3 mallocs, but the
> first two are never freed.
>
> That is just a small matter of moving the free outside the if. :-)
>
> int buf_size = 100;
> while (1)
> {
> buf = (char *) xmalloc (buf_size);
> if (getcwd (buf, buf_size) == buf)
> break;
> free (buf);
> if (errno != ERANGE)
At this point errno may already be changed by free(). Why not just use
xrealloc in the first place?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, (continued)
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/31
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Jan D., 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2005/07/30
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/31
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/29
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/30