[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:43:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I think the handling in byteopt.el is about generating bytecode (or
> not doing it, for XEmacs-specific code) while the one in bytecomp.el
> is about not issuing warnings for XEmacs features. For example, it
> silences a warning in flymake.el about the use of
> `multiple-value-bind'.
The one in byteopt.el was introduced mostly to remove spurious warnings.
The fact that it optimizes the bytecode was just a nicve side-effect.
So I'm wondering in which circumstance the new code is useful/necessary.
Stefan
- Strange change in bytecmop.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/21
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/21
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/23
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, David Kastrup, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, David Kastrup, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/07/25
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, David Kastrup, 2005/07/25
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/25