[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:12:43 +0200 |
On 7/21/05, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> the last part not only is strange because (featurep 'emacs) is never used
> (since Emacs does not provide the `emacs' feature)
Yeah, I pointed this out in a message a few days ago. Perhaps it'd be
useful to define the feature 'emacs, but even so it won't be a
reliable way to detect GNU Emacs for years and years...
> but also because it tries
> to handle (featurep 'xemacs) even though that's already handled in
> byteopt.el where we do:
I think the handling in byteopt.el is about generating bytecode (or
not doing it, for XEmacs-specific code) while the one in bytecomp.el
is about not issuing warnings for XEmacs features. For example, it
silences a warning in flymake.el about the use of
`multiple-value-bind'.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- Strange change in bytecmop.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/21
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/23
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, David Kastrup, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, David Kastrup, 2005/07/24
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/07/25
- Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el, David Kastrup, 2005/07/25