Re: w32 does not have emacsclient/server

[Lennart Borgman]

David Kastrup wrote:

> Well, obviously port emacsclient.  Somebody already took a look of it
> IIRC, but nothing has been heard of it since.
>
> And with any other stuff: if nobody does the work, it will not be
> done.  As far as I remember, this is a "simple" nobody-did-it-yet
> case.  It is not part of any strategy or something.
Yes, nobody has done it yet and I believe there is no one working on it 
actively at the moment. I raised the issue to see if someone could do it.

I have suggested that there might be too few developers on the w32 side. 
In that sense it may actually be part of a strategy. I would be glad to 
be proven wrong.