Re: address@hidden: enlarge-window with preserve-before non-nil]

[Jan D.]

Richard Stallman wrote:

> The incorrect structure is in i3, so I think it should eliminate i3.
> The criterion for doing so is that i3 is a vchild of its parent
> and also has a vchild.  That should never occur.
>
> After the code operates on i3, putting it in place of i2, it check if
> i3 is a vchild and has a vchild.  If so, it should to eliminate i3,
> putting w4 into its place in the structure, and make w3 be the next of
> w5.
>
> Want to implement that?
>
> (The same thing should be done with hchild.)
>
>  

Stefan Monnier wrote:

> Whoever can do that, please sprinkle some corresponding asserts in the code.
>  

I finally checked in a fix for this, but I didn't feel I could add any 
asserts that I was sure about, sorry.

   Jan D.