[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
Subject: |
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks. |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2005 03:40:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Katsumi Yamaoka <address@hidden> writes:
> run-mode-hooks is only available in Emacs 22, while Gnus v5.11
> still supports Emacs 20 and 21 (and No Gnus supports Emacs 21).
>
> 2005-05-26 Lute Kamstra <address@hidden>
>
> * score-mode.el (gnus-score-mode): Use run-mode-hooks.
Sorry about that.
> Is it possible to use run-hooks in those Emacs versions?
Maybe Gnus can do something like:
(or (fboundp 'run-mode-hooks)
(defalias 'run-mode-hooks 'run-hooks))
I saw that most hooks are run with gnus-run-hooks, which calls
run-hooks. Maybe you can also define a gnus-run-mode-hooks that uses
run-mode-hooks instead and use that function for Gnus' major modes?
Lute.
- run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/25
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.,
Lute Kamstra <=
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/27
- RE: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Drew Adams, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Miles Bader, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/30