Re: called by a process filter?

[Kim F. Storm]

Kevin Rodgers <address@hidden> writes:

> Kim F. Storm wrote:
>  > I would expect it to be buffer local, and as such, it would only be
>  > triggered by filter functions that update that buffer.
>
> But when a filter function updates the buffer, this change function
> (whether global or buffer local) should do nothing.

Can you please show us the code and tell us what you try to accomplish.

As Stefan has already suggested, an after-change-function is probably
the wrong tool for the job.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk