[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL slows
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL slows |
Date: |
Fri, 6 May 2005 19:03:04 +0000 (UTC) |
[I just sent a message saying I first had
(add-hook 'rmail-show-message-hook 'goto-address)
in my .emacs file. I got many overlapping overlays. Then I commented
that line out and started a new instance of Emacs. I got only two
overlays, neither overlapping.]
Now I have uncommented the line and started yet a newer instance of
Emacs. So I add the hook again. On doing this for the same RMAIL file
as before on the same message:
(pp
(save-restriction
(widen)
(overlays-in (point-min)
(point-max)))
(get-buffer-create "*overlays*"))
I see the following:
(#<overlay from 1150322 to 1150363 in RMAIL> #<overlay from 1150338 to 1150362
in RMAIL> #<overlay from 1150300 to 1150315 in RMAIL> #<overlay from 1150271 to
1150290 in RMAIL> #<overlay from 1150250 to 1150268 in RMAIL> #<overlay from
1150211 to 1150230 in RMAIL>)
Two overlays overlap:
#<overlay from 1150322 to 1150363 in RMAIL>
#<overlay from 1150338 to 1150362 in RMAIL>
For this, the overlay properties for `nth 0' are
(face bold)
but for `nth 1' are
(goto-address t keymap
(keymap
(3 keymap
(13 . goto-address-at-point))
(mouse-2 . goto-address-at-mouse))
help-echo "mouse-2, C-c RET: mail this address" mouse-face
secondary-selection face italic)
For `nth 2' they are
(face bold)
again.
Hope this helps!
--
Robert J. Chassell
address@hidden GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, (continued)
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/18
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/05/17
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/18
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/05/19
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/19
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/20
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default? Conclusion: No!, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/27
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default? Conclusion: No!, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/28
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default? Conclusion: No!, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/30
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default? Conclusion: No!, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/31
- Re: RMAIL slows,
Robert J. Chassell <=
- Re: RMAIL slows, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/06
Re: RMAIL slows, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/05