[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-name-shadow-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: file-name-shadow-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:42:22 -0500 |
But actually, I think my proposal about a C level interface into
substitute-in-file-name would be most efficient, robust and
unproblematic in the long run, and possibly useful for other
applications as well.
I don't want to do this, because it puts too much complexity in a
place where it could cause trouble. I'd rather just stay away from it.
To duplicate just the parsing aspect of substitute-in-file-name
for this one purpose would be better.
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, (continued)
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Miles Bader, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/23
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/23
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/25
Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/18