[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The WHY of Xft [was: Re: Antialiased text on X11]
From: |
James Cloos |
Subject: |
The WHY of Xft [was: Re: Antialiased text on X11] |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:45:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
It should be pointed out that antialiasing and sub-pixel rendering are
just two of the benefits of the client-side font system brought by Xft
and friends.
The other benefits are just as important. Control and installation of
fonts are easier for most users, fonts with large encodings -- such as
CJKV fonts or any iso10646-encoded font -- use *much* less vm and data
transfer between client and server is reduced for most workloads.
Even w/o antialiasing the user's experience improves.
-JimC
--
James H. Cloos, Jr. <address@hidden> <http://jhcloos.com>
- Antialiased text on X11, James Cloos, 2005/03/10
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/10
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Han Boetes, 2005/03/10
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Jan D., 2005/03/11
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Ali Ijaz Sheikh, 2005/03/18
- RE: Antialiased text on X11, Drew Adams, 2005/03/18
- The WHY of Xft [was: Re: Antialiased text on X11],
James Cloos <=
- Re: The WHY of Xft [was: Re: Antialiased text on X11], Miles Bader, 2005/03/19
- Re: The WHY of Xft, James Cloos, 2005/03/20
- Re: The WHY of Xft, Miles Bader, 2005/03/20
- Re: The WHY of Xft, David Hansen, 2005/03/21
- Re: The WHY of Xft, James Cloos, 2005/03/21
- Re: The WHY of Xft, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/20
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Miles Bader, 2005/03/18
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Jan D., 2005/03/19
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Miles Bader, 2005/03/19
- Re: Antialiased text on X11, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/19