[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push and pop
From: |
JD Smith |
Subject: |
Re: push and pop |
Date: |
09 Jan 2005 10:53:55 -0700 |
On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 08:34, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I think the confusion for me and lots of others: many installs (like
> Fedora/Red Hat) include site-start stuff that does (or did) a (require
> 'cl) somewhere.
>
> Changing Emacs that way is not a good idea. If people come across
> these in the future, would you please complain to the maintainers
> of those distros?
I should point out that this has since been fixed in recent Fedora
releases, which is why I encountered the new behavior in the first
place. Is there a technical reason the subr push and pop can't behave
like the cl versions? I suspect they're the most commonly used of the
cl macros, and it's confusing to have similarly named macros with
different behavior.
JD
- push and pop, JD Smith, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, David Kastrup, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/08
- Re: push and pop, JD Smith, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, Miles Bader, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/08
- Re: push and pop,
JD Smith <=
- Re: push and pop, Francis Litterio, 2005/01/09
- Re: push and pop, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/09
- Re: push and pop, David Kastrup, 2005/01/09
- Re: push and pop, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/10