[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug 130397 (Was: Emacs - Ispell problem with i[no]german dictionary)
From: |
Agustin Martin |
Subject: |
Re: Bug 130397 (Was: Emacs - Ispell problem with i[no]german dictionary) |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:34:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:50:33PM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote:
> Hmmm, then how about the attached patch to the latest CVS
> emacs? With that, all equivalent charaters (e.g a-grave in
> all laitn-X) should be handled well. This patch will be
> applicable also to Emacs 21.3 but not yet tested in that
> version.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the patch, and sorry for not being very responsive these days. I
can hardly keep up to date with my mail.
Your patch applies cleanly to ispell.el shipped with dictionaries-common
(just some minor shift), since it is 3.6 as well as for CVS emacs.
First noting that I still get ispell misalignement errors when spellchecking
an utf8 file with an iso-8859-15 dict for chars not in the iso-8859-1 set
(oe-char).
I also had some problems when making it work with the different emacsen
flavours. For sid emacs21 (21.3+1-8) works with some limitations, that seem
somewhat similar to those for my dirty hack. However for older versions
(e.g., woody emacs21) ucs-mule-8859-to-mule-unicode seems not avilable, as
well as for emacs20, so I get
Symbol's value as variable is void: ucs-mule-8859-to-mule-unicode
For xemacs, besides the known problems with buffer-file-coding-system I also
get the error message
Unrecognized char table type: ispell-unified-chars-table
Note that ispell.el at dictionaries-common package must work with all the
shipped emacsen flavours (unless the problem is due to a bug in the emacsen
flavour), currently emacs21 and xemacs21-{mule,nomule...} and preferrably to
not make things worse for previous flavours (emacs20, no need of going back
more, even if I sometimes test emacs19), so we need to be very conservative.
Some checks are possible, however, but I am rather undecided about that.
Thanks a lot for your feedback,
Cheers,
--
Agustin
- Re: Bug 130397, (continued)
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/13
- Re: Bug 130397, Juri Linkov, 2005/01/18
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/01/18
- Re: Bug 130397, Juri Linkov, 2005/01/19
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/01/19
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/18
- Re: Bug 130397, Juri Linkov, 2005/01/19
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/19
- Re: Bug 130397, David Kastrup, 2005/01/19
- Re: Bug 130397, Ken Stevens, 2005/01/07
Re: Bug 130397 (Was: Emacs - Ispell problem with i[no]german dictionary),
Agustin Martin <=