[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement'
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement' |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:55:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> It sounds like a good change. Stefan, are you convinced?
>
> Not really, but I don't think my opinion should have any special value here.
> I'm after all not the typical user and I'm biased because I've gotten used
> to the current behavior. If people like it, go for it. I might even end up
> liking it as well, who knows.
I noticed that in one half of situations I needed to start a new
region with M-C-SPC, in another half to extend the active region.
But while starting a new region is easy after C-g or C-SPC, extending
the existing region was not possible at all. It is too inconvenient
to start from scratch when the last command was not M-C-SPC, and to
repeat a sequence of M-C-SPC to restore the previous region before
continuing to extend it further.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- `inhibit-mark-movement', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/07
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/07
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Richard Stallman, 2004/12/13
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/13
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement',
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/14
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/17
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Richard Stallman, 2004/12/20
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/07
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/07