[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: printing.el again
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: printing.el again |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:47:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
* Stefan (2004-11-16) writes:
> Actually, I don't think optimizations should be particularly mentioned.
> The interesting part of optimizing (featurep 'xemacs) is that it eliminates
> spurious warnings. There are other ways to get the same effect, such as
> what is done with (if (fboundp 'foo) ...) where the test is not optimized
> away, but where warnings are selectively prevented.
Is it planned to recognize (and (fboundp 'foo) ...) and (and (boundp
'foo) ...) as well? In AUCTeX we have a lot of them and consequently
a lot of warnings from the byte compiler.
--
Ralf
- printing.el again, Stefan, 2004/11/14
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/14
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/14
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/16
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/17
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/18
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: printing.el again, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/19
- Re: printing.el again, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/17