[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:34:11 +0900 |
Stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> I.e. just transform the current error into a warning.
I'd suggest this as the short-term fix. It can use appropriately big
letters or whitespace or whatever, to be noticeable.
-Miles
--
Freedom's just another word, for nothing left to lose --Janis Joplin
- `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Miles Bader, 2004/10/04
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/04
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Miles Bader, 2004/10/04
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/04
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/05
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/05
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/05
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Stefan, 2004/10/05
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Miles Bader, 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/06
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Camm Maguire, 2004/10/07
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/07
- Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?, Jan D., 2004/10/07