Re: where-is-internal's firstonly

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Stefan <address@hidden> writes:

>>  In short, where-is-internal finds the last binding in the
>>  first active map.

>>  Is this a bug?

> It's not a bug in the sense that the documentation is silent about this part
> of the behavior.  Usually the selection of "which binding to use" uses other
> criterions such as "simple ascii char vs. mouse binding".

Thank you for the clarification.

> But that also means that changing the behavior such that "1" is returned in
> your example would not introduce a bug either and it can be argued that it'd
> be a better behavior.

I put this issue in my todo-list.  As it is not a bug, let's
fix it after the release.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden