[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.]
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:32:05 -0400 |
Or simpler:
CVS version: 22.0
Pretests: 22.0.1, 22.0.2, ...
Initial release: 22.1
Bug fixes: 22.2, 22.3
Minor release = bug fixes
Although I like the idea of negative numbers for pretests best,
this plan is also simple and clear. We could use it if the other
has some kind of problem.
That's what I originally wrote and then I switched back to 22.0.50 and
22.0.90 because 22.0 bug reports would otherwise be sent to gnu.emacs.bug
rather than to emacs-pretest-bug ;-0
We can easily change the criteria in emacs-pretest-bug
for whatever version scheme we use.
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Rob Browning, 2004/10/05
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/05
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Rob Browning, 2004/10/05
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Rob Browning, 2004/10/05
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/06
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/01
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/10/01
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Richard Stallman, 2004/10/02
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.],
Richard Stallman <=
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Rob Browning, 2004/10/04