[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.]
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:33:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> No, the .50 is used for all the "versions" until the first pretest.
>> The pretests then start at .90, then .91, .92, ... and can go to
>> .9999999999999999997, ... so we have a large enough pool of pretest
>> version numbers.
> Actually, some major releases went above .100 in the minor-minor
> field.
True, that's another way to continue the sequence after .90, ..., .99
and IIRC both have been used in the past. I like the .999 scheme better,
tho ;-)
Stefan
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Rob Browning, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Jérôme Marant, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.],
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Richard Stallman, 2004/09/30
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Kenichi Handa, 2004/09/27