[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: calendar-goto-iso-week
From: |
Ed Reingold |
Subject: |
Re: calendar-goto-iso-week |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:06:47 -0500 |
I am hoping that one of you will make the changes in the source--I haven't
done that in a long while and no longer remember where/how!
> Ed Reingold writes:
>
> >> It's my experience that one more often wants to move to a
> >> week in the current year. So I changed your code to only
> >> ask for YEAR when called with a prefix argument. What do
> >> you think?
>
> > I prefer what I had because it is consistent with the
> > other "go-to" date functions.
>
> OK, that's an argument.
>
> >> Also note the use of calendar-week-start-day bellow.
>
> > I did not use that because on the ISO calendar it is
> > Monday that is the first day of the week,; what is
> > displayed is irrelevant--it is a matter of the ISO
> > definition!
>
> I see, thanks for the info. Maybe one could put a comment
> in the code explaining this for those of us not so familiar
> with calendars?
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/02
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/09/02
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/03
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Detlev Zundel, 2004/09/04
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Ed Reingold, 2004/09/05
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/11
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Ed Reingold, 2004/09/11
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/12
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week,
Ed Reingold <=
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/13
- Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Ed Reingold, 2004/09/13
Re: calendar-goto-iso-week, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/04