[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: void variable
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: void variable |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:52:37 -0500 (CDT) |
Would the following patches be more useful than my original ones?
After reading Richard's reply, I realized that I forgot about
autoloaded variables in that second patch. So I believe that my first
patch would be better. If we would actually go for the second, then:
+ Thus, if you make a local binding for a variable that is defined in
should twice be replaced with:
Thus, if you make a local binding for a non-autoloaded variable
that is defined in ...
Sincerely,
Luc.
- void variable, Lars Hansen, 2004/07/25
- Re: void variable, Adrian Aichner, 2004/07/25
- Re: void variable, Lars Hansen, 2004/07/25
- Re: void variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/25
- Re: void variable,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: void variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/25
- Re: void variable, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/26
- Re: void variable, Lars Hansen, 2004/07/26
- Re: void variable, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/27
- Re: void variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/28
- Re: void variable, Lars Hansen, 2004/07/29
- Re: void variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/29
- Re: void variable, Lars Hansen, 2004/07/30
- Re: void variable, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/30
- Re: void variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/26