[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug tracking
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bug tracking |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:57:51 -0400 |
Isn't there a system that supports both UUCP like batch email service
as well as web-based service? I am not a strong advocate of either
system but your comments do not sound forward-looking but anachronism.
It is not my goal to be "forward-looking" for its own sake. I made
this decision based on practicalities.
When you describe my decision to use low tech as an "anachronism",
that exaggeration means only a sneer at what is unfashionable.
That is unjust, so please don't do it here.
- Re: Bug tracking, (continued)
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Jason Rumney, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), David Kastrup, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Robert J. Chassell, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Karl Fogel, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Robert J. Chassell, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking, Oliver Scholz, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/14
- Re: Bug tracking, Tak Ota, 2004/06/14
- Re: Bug tracking,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Bug tracking, Tak Ota, 2004/06/16
Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Richard Stallman, 2004/06/14