[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ChangeLog fontifications
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: ChangeLog fontifications |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2004 09:22:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:08:59AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > Anyway (as I keep saying), I've used both extensively, and the
> > `official' format is easier to read.
>
> could it be easier to read precisely because Emacs supports it better?
Probably not.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, (continued)
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/17
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Karl Eichwalder, 2004/05/18
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Miles Bader, 2004/05/18
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Sam Steingold, 2004/05/19
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/19
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/19