[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:54:18 -0400 |
But it does simplify the explanation of what (face-attribute X :foo)
returns (since we've already dealt with the issue of whether it returns the
info corresponding to Y or to Y+Z or to Y+Z+default).
You have lost me here. How does explaining what (face-attribute X
:foo) means relate to this issue? This remapping has no effect
on face-attribute.
Maybe it doesn't make the current implementation simple, but it at least
makes the concept simpler. OTOH, that's assuming that "99% of the remapping
[will] just be from X to Y". This 99% assumption assumes that mapping X
to (X Y) doesn't work, tho.
OTOH, I must say that the most important use of this remapping facility
would be to tweak faces in various modes, so mapping X to (X Y) would be
the most useful application, if not the only one. So maybe we should
have face-addition-alist rather face-remapping-alist so we could just put
(region . bold) in order to add bold to the region face.
The existing feature is just as simple as either of these,
and more powerful. I see no reason to replace it with anything
less powerful.
- +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/05
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/24