Re: Two questions about thumbs.el

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 26 Apr 2004 18:39:21 +0200, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:

> This functionality is obviously generally useful.
> Maybe time-less-p should be defined in subr.el?

time-less-p, time-subtract, time-add, time-to-days, time-to-day-in-year
and date-leap-year-p are all documented on the *Time Calculations* node
of the Emacs Lisp manual. It feels a bit weird to have one on subr.el
and the rest on calendar/time-date.el

OTOH, it seems like time-less-p is the only one generally used, so I
suppose you're right.

Opinions?

                                                           /L/e/k/t/u