[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compilation to native
From: |
Matthew Mundell |
Subject: |
Re: Compilation to native |
Date: |
16 Apr 2004 15:22:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
(nobody) writes:
> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > BTW I noticed that one difference between our commands is that my stack
> > ref/set ops use the _absolute_ position on the stack (counted from the
> > base),
> > not a TOS-relative position.
Yes. The optimisation could use the absolute versions. That could
save the byte compiler from having to count the change in stack depth
when replacing the loop's varsets and varrefs.
However, for native compilation the relative positions may be
required, to save having to record the position of the bottom of the
stack.
- Re: Pure strings (Re: Compilation to native), (continued)
Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/12
- Re: Compilation to native, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/13
- Re: Compilation to native, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/13
- Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/13
- Re: Compilation to native, Miles Bader, 2004/04/13
- Re: Compilation to native, Miles Bader, 2004/04/13
- Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/14
- Re: Compilation to native,
Matthew Mundell <=
Re: Compilation to native, Miles Bader, 2004/04/13
Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/16
Re: Compilation to native, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/16
Re: Compilation to native, Matthew Mundell, 2004/04/16