[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: typo in frame.el
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: typo in frame.el |
Date: |
09 Apr 2004 23:11:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
"Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:
> How about we use "<=>", conventionally, in doc strings, but we also
> explain this convention in the Emacs manual, for those who have
> never seen it? If we adopt such a convention, then we should perhaps
> also conventionally use "=>" for "implies" ("only if") and "<=" for
> "if".
I object. Really. This would carry the message that Emacs is
intended for mathematicians and/or scientists as main audience. Apart
from which those symbols are just ASCII art representations from what
they are supposed to be.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- typo in frame.el, Hiroshi Fujishima, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Alex Schroeder, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: typo in frame.el, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/11
- Re: typo in frame.el, Alan Shutko, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/10