[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lisp/url/url-https.el
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: lisp/url/url-https.el |
Date: |
08 Apr 2004 17:21:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> The file lisp/url/url-https.el doesn't do anything useful, it
> seems, if ssl.el isn't installed (or if OpenSSL isn't
> installed).
>
> We have to delete that file, I think, since it is crypto code.
I would not call it "crypto code" since it does not do encryption.
Not as far as I can see. It is just an interface to such code. As
long as the code itself is not distributed with Emacs, I don't think
that Emacs should be affected legally.
> (It should not have been on savannah at all.) tls.el has to be
> deleted too, I'm sad to say.
>
> There are files in Gnus that also have to go.
>
> Exporting crypto code from the US is no longer forbidden, but the US
> government claims to impose restrictions on people who obtain copies
> overseas and then redistribute them to certain places. For this
> reason, all GNU crypto code should be developed and released from
> outside the US, still.
But the code in question does not do encryption, I think. Are you
really sure that it would fall under such terms? Perhaps one should
check with a lawyer.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- lisp/url/url-https.el, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/07
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/08
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/10
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/10
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/11
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Mario Lang, 2004/04/13
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/14
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/04/14