[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
08 Apr 2004 17:46:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa wrote:
>
> > I have thought that we are going to take the following
> > schedule.
> > (1) Release the current RC branch as 21.4.
>
> That was discussed some weeks ago, but no pretest has begun yet, so
> maybe it is better to skip this if it is going to take a long time
> anyway.
I would say that depends on how long we expect the 21.5 pretest to take.
If THAT takes a long time, let's go for a 21.4 pretest now, and release
quickly if the pretest doesn't reveal anything major (compared to 21.3).
>
> > (2) Feature freeze on HEAD.
> > (3) Merge HEAD into RC branch, and make it 21.4.50.
>
> I think making a new branch would be easier than merging. I doubt
> there are important bugfixes in the RC branch that are not already in
> HEAD.
I agree that we should leave the old RC branch as is (ending with 21.4)
and create a new RC branch for 21.5 _asap_!!.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Compilation to native, (continued)
- Re: Compilation to native, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/07
- Re: Compilation to native, Alex Schroeder, 2004/04/07
- Re: Compilation to native, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/07
- It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/07
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/07
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., John Wiegley, 2004/04/07
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., John Wiegley, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Piet van Oostrum, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Jason Rumney, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/08
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Romain Francoise, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/10