[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:43:32 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 20:50:01 -0500
> From: address@hidden (Karl Berry)
>
> Eli, can you think of a way
> \*[Nn]ote[ \t\n]+
> could fail?
That one could work; I was mainly concerned by the preceding blank.
> As Juri says, there are tons of places where "*Note*" is output for
> various reasons. It would be nice if it just worked
What if we make this case to silently fail, instead of making an
incompatible change?
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Karl Berry, 2004/04/01
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/01
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Karl Berry, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Karl Berry, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/02