[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
01 Apr 2004 10:53:18 +0900 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> > I intensely dislike this sort of `ah modes can just rebind the key' way of
> > avoiding a level of indirection, because often I use different global
> > bindings that normal
>
> I'm on your camp here regarding having explicit levels of indirection.
>
> Still, I don't find your example compelling at all, because the given
> examples are not equivalent. I can imagine a (more or less) all-purpose
> `fill-paragraph', but it's less easy to imagine an all-purpose
> `done-editing-now-do-it'
You may very well be right in this case; I was mostly just trying to say
that in the case where there _is_ a generic function that occasionally
is overridden by modes &c, rebinding of the default key-sequence is not
a good override mechanism.
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25