[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 18:53:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>> >> For what it's worth I always thought C-c C-c was the natural binding
>> >> for `compile' (or more generally for "here, I'm done editing, now
>> >> process what I've edited").
>>
>> > C-c C-c, however, is used by _many_ modes to mean "do the most common
>> > thing", including modes where you want to be able to call "compile".
>>
>> That might be, but I haven't come across such conflicts in my short life.
>> What conflicts did you encounter?
> How about AUCTeX? C-c C-c is the central dispatcher, and you might
> want to use compile for running make-based compilations.
Isn't AUCTeX's central dispatcher supposed to be a "better compile"
so that you don't need compile for those cases? At least I can't remember
wishing to run `compile' when I was using AUCTeX. And it can't be that
hard to add `make' to the list of AUCTeX actions, can it?
Stefan
- Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, John Wiegley, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eric Hanchrow, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, ams, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/31