[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Jari Aalto+mail.emacs |
Subject: |
Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:11:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195) |
M-g in current 21.3 is mapped to binding "set face default".
First, it is not possible to obtain any help information with
standard binding to see what it actually does:
C-h k M-g
Second, it is unlikely that new Emacs user, or even
experienced one seldom uses this keybinding. I have yet to
find use for this functionality (= never used in my Emacs
lifetime).
There may be few users that may potentially find the current
binding useful in some cases. But I hardly think those few
users needs should be put first, when considering the
usefulness of the current binding in large.
If put side by side, "set face default" and goto-line, I would
estimate that the 99 % of the cases, there is more need for
goto-line. Therefore it would be better if the M-g was mapped
to it.
Users need line information. After all, Emacs for most, is
programming language development environment: C / C++, Python,
Perl, Ruby etc. In time they may find and start use other
features like Gnus, Mail and others.
The "de facto" situation for long has been that everybody maps
M-g to goto-line. People advice that in newsgroups, because it
is indeed the most logical key.
If we would take a poll in Emacs newsgroups, presumably the
"yes" votes for goto-line would win in great majority.
It would be better if Emacs supported this 99 % daily usage of
M-g, instead of current not-so-useful binding.
Jari
- Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Jari Aalto+mail.emacs <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, John Wiegley, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eric Hanchrow, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, ams, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25