[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 04:21:39 -0500 |
When mail-interactive is nil, Emacs should not wait.
Many years ago I found that waiting for sendmail to finish took so
long it was intolerable. Maybe that has changed; if so, we could
change the default value of mail-interactive to make Emacs wait
by default.
What experiences do people have?
- sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Rob Browning, 2004/01/20
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/20
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/01/21
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/21
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/22
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/22
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/23
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Jan D., 2004/01/23
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Jan D., 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Jan D., 2004/01/26