[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits |
Date: |
22 Nov 2003 00:56:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> [BoehmGC]
> > Dave Love has started work on this and it would be interesting to see
> > how it works out in practice (what kind of impact it has on memory
> > footprint and CPU usage).
>
> What is the status of that effort? Dave?
>
> IMHO, this is not a user-visible change, so I think we have more
> important things to work on.
Actually, the current tag work _has_ been inspired by user complaints,
and it is quite user-visible. It changes the value of
most-positive-fixnum, and thus the maximum size of Emacs buffers.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, (continued)
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/19
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/20
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/23