[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, rmail-mbox-branch
From: |
Alexander Pohoyda |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, rmail-mbox-branch |
Date: |
22 Oct 2003 22:26:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Problems I have encountered so far:
1) If RMAIL file does not exist, rmail-display-labels function fails
deep inside rmaildesc.el and I dont see a reason to display labels if
there are no messages.
Proposed solution:
Index: rmail.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/mail/rmail.el,v
retrieving revision 1.368.2.5
diff -u -r1.368.2.5 rmail.el
--- rmail.el 23 Feb 2003 00:33:25 -0000 1.368.2.5
+++ rmail.el 22 Oct 2003 19:42:05 -0000
@@ -2458,7 +2460,6 @@
;; out of the Rmail file so as not to break other mail agents.
(progn
(message "No messages to show. Add something better soon.")
- (rmail-display-labels)
(force-mode-line-update))
;; There are messages. Show one.
2) rmail-use-spam-filter is void variable, used in rmail-get-new-mail
function. It is defined in rmail-spam-filter.el, but we cannot
(require 'rmail-spam-filter) before the rmail-mode-map variable is
defined further in rmail.el file.
I'm not sure what is a right way to fix this.
3) Deleting the last message makes rmail-summary-goto-msg to call
itself recursively in a dead loop.
Proposed solution:
Index: rmailsum.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/mail/rmailsum.el,v
retrieving revision 1.127.2.2
diff -u -r1.127.2.2 rmailsum.el
--- rmailsum.el 18 Feb 2003 16:47:23 -0000 1.127.2.2
+++ rmailsum.el 22 Oct 2003 20:22:17 -0000
@@ -1081,7 +1081,8 @@
(if (< n 1)
(progn (message "No preceding message")
(setq n 1)))
- (if (> n total)
+ (if (and (> n total)
+ (> total 0))
(progn (message "No following message")
(goto-char (point-max))
(rmail-summary-goto-msg nil nowarn skip-rmail)))
--
Alexander Pohoyda <address@hidden>
PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, (continued)
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, rmail-mbox-branch,
Alexander Pohoyda <=
- Re: RMAIL, rmail-mbox-branch, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Juri Linkov, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Juri Linkov, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/10/20
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/20