[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:42:25 +0300 |
> From: Simon Josefsson <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:35:37 +0200
>
> Doesn't Emacs CVS support the entire Unicode repertoire?
It currently only supports the parts of the BMP whose codepoints are
in the ranges 0000-33ff and e000-ffff. It doesn't support anything
beyond that.
- More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/27
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/28
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Alex Schroeder, 2003/04/28