[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
23 Apr 2003 10:39:15 +0900 |
David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
> Believe it or not, I'm familiar with good bug reporting practice. The
> problem is that I don't know whether anyone's interested in looking at
> it and I feel that I can't give much detail about the problem.
I think the problem is that you've been discussing this with others, so
the context is clear to you, but you sent your message cold to
emacs-devel, so we don't have any of that context.
-Miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, (continued)
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Miles Bader <=
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22