[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:03:29 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), cygwin32) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:15:05AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
>> > Um, it might help if you actually said what operation is slower....
>>
>> Almost anything. `M-g' to get new message headers is one example, but
>> downloading a large message (with, say, a several-megabyte
>> attachment), shows a really remarkable difference in speed.
>
> Almost anything, like C-f, C-n, and M-x hanoi?
No, almost anything that involves talking to the IMAP server. I'm
sorry, I thought that was obvious from my previous post, but I see now
that it wasn't.
> At least in this message you gave an example -- M-g (I assume in a gnus
> summary buffer) -- but even that is very vague. Is it only with imap (as you
> previously implied)?
Yes.
> Does it happen with local (file) mailboxes too? Pop3?
No.
> If you want to report a bug, please give specific examples, with
> lots of details!
It's hard to gather much detail on this one. What more would you like.
> What may be obvious to you isn't necessarily
> obvious to the rest of us; see the info node `(emacs)Bugs'.
Believe it or not, I'm familiar with good bug reporting practice. The
problem is that I don't know whether anyone's interested in looking at
it and I feel that I can't give much detail about the problem. I can
say that it's been reproduced by others, though.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
David Abrahams <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24