Re: eval-after-load as a macro (and eval-next-after-load)

[Kai Großjohann]

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:

> Of course, such a change would introduce an incompatibility,
> but it turns out that I think it's rather minor.  We can detect
> the case where the argument is of the form (quote ...) and
> treat it as it was before.  That takes care of 98% of the
> case.

Maybe the backward compatibility behavior should be documented;
otherwise people reading the `wrong' usage might get confused.
-- 
A preposition is not a good thing to end a sentence with.