Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions.

[Andrew Choi]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> Andrew Choi <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > On MAC, I noticed two places in macterm.c where FRAME_X_P is tested
> > > rather than FRAME_MAC_P, which basically means that the corresponding
> > > code _IS_NOT_ executed:
> > > 
> > >  * In x_flush, the call to XFlush is conditioned by FRAME_X_P
> > > 
> > >  * In XTframe_up_to_date, the entire code is conditioned by FRAME_X_P.
> > > 
> > > Could a MAC expect please check these two strange-looking cases for
> > > me, thanks!
> > 
> > These are probably just cases I copied code from w32term.c or xterm.c
> > and then forgot to change them.  They will work fine if changed to
> > FRAME_MAC_P.
> 
> Ok.  I'll fix those.
> 
> I just wonder: Does it also run fine without changing them
> (i.e. without executing the conditioned code?)

Yes, it does.