Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions.

[Kim F. Storm]

Andrew Choi <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> 
> > [...]
> > 
> > On MAC, I noticed two places in macterm.c where FRAME_X_P is tested
> > rather than FRAME_MAC_P, which basically means that the corresponding
> > code _IS_NOT_ executed:
> > 
> >  * In x_flush, the call to XFlush is conditioned by FRAME_X_P
> > 
> >  * In XTframe_up_to_date, the entire code is conditioned by FRAME_X_P.
> > 
> > Could a MAC expect please check these two strange-looking cases for
> > me, thanks!
> 
> These are probably just cases I copied code from w32term.c or xterm.c
> and then forgot to change them.  They will work fine if changed to
> FRAME_MAC_P.

Ok.  I'll fix those.

I just wonder: Does it also run fine without changing them
(i.e. without executing the conditioned code?)

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk