[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some dired hints should be background jobs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: some dired hints should be background jobs |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 06:13:02 +0200 |
> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 17:00:01 -0700
>
> > I know so little about MS Windows (I use GNU/Linux) that I do not
> > really understand the above. Do you mean we could not make "xpdf *
> > &" the default because MS Windows does not understand & and hence
> > it would not be portable? Does MS Windows have a notion of job
> > control? It must have a notion of asynchronous command since it is
> > a windowing system.
>
> Yep, that's exactly what I mean. On some Windows shells you can use
> "start", but not all.
Which ones don't support `start'? AFAIK, all of them do.
> In fact, I don't believe there is any common
> way of backgrounding a job that gets run via shell invocation.
Actually, I think this is the default on Windows: a GUI program
always opens its own window, and the shell that invoked it doesn't
wit for it. If not, you could use `start'.
> This could mean that "&" is just a UNIX(ish) thing.
That's true in the sense that the "&" syntax is not understood by
stock Windows shells.