[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
From: |
Dmitry Paduchikh |
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:30:48 +0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hi!
>>>>> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Morever, `#' is _good_ becaues it's the general lisp syntax for special
> syntax, so a lisp programmer will be much more likely to realize what's going
> on (if he's unfamiliar with this particular bit of syntax) if he sees #\SPC
> than if he sees ?SPC.
If you will do this, why not introduce such alternative syntax for
_all_ characters? It would give the advantage of being consistent with
other lispish languages since both CL and Scheme use `#\' to denote
characters.
- Re: ?\_ patch, (continued)
- Re: ?\_ patch, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Dmitry Paduchikh <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/08
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/09
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Damien Elmes, 2003/02/07