[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28] |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:38:04 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Kenichi Handa wrote:
>> > Sorry, I don't think I understand the difference. What will we have
>> > in the buffer after process output is converted as you describe in the
>> > last paragraph above?
>>
>> Ok, here's an example (Latin-1 lang. env.).
> Thanks for taking time to explain these subtleties.
>> (1) Reading a process output by raw-text into a multibyte
>> buffer does AS conversion. I think this should do TO
>> conversion to be consistent with (3).
> I tend to agree, but without knowing the exact reason for the current
> behavior, I fear that we will break something.
I don't remeber well now. :-(
Perhpas, because there was a choise only between
string-as-multibyte and string-make-multibyte, and I thought
string-as-multibyte is less surprising than
string-make-multibyte. That is because the reason for
specifying raw-text or no-conversion for process should be
that one doesn't want code conversion. If we use
string-make-multibyte, the result is almost the same as
decoding by, for instance, iso-latin-1.
If we had string-to-multibyte at that time, I might have
used it.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], (continued)
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/29
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Miles Bader, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28],
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/22
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/19
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/21