Re: emacs test suite

[Jason Rumney]

Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:

> > That's cool, but why do you need the branch to be local?
> 
> Well, I don't "need" it to be - this is only a matter of convenience. 
> But it would be nice if this didn't even require discussion or Richard
> having to make a decision apriori about whether my work is credible
> before he has even seen it.  If the branch was local, I would just get
> to work, and everyone could worry about these decisions later when it
> was more than vaporware, saving valuable coordinate effort.

Read the section of the CVS manual about vendor branches. Perhaps
that would give the functionality you want.