[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:54:15 -0500 |
I had this problem with my enhancement to compilations (calling
`compile-internal'). I solved it by letting the user use the prefix
argument (\C-u) to specify a remote compilation.
That could be a good approach, since both options are useful.
Unfortunately, shell-command already takes a prefix argument.
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/02
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/10
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/11
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/12
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/12
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Andreas Schwab, 2003/01/13
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Ehud Karni, 2003/01/13
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/14
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/15