[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode.
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode. |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:05:16 +0000 |
> > + (save-excursion
> > + (set-buffer buffer)
>
> Aka `with-current-buffer'.
When I replaced functions like insert-buffer with insert-buffer-substring, I
noticed that (besides not clobbering the mark) I was replacing a compiled lisp
function with one that was built-in. This presumably had a speed advantage.
with-current-buffer is `just a macro' (for the above construction) as is
dolist (which I have used, so you can teach an old dog *some* new tricks)
so presumably there is no speed advantage. Looking at dolist it might even be
slower. Would it make sense for someone (more clever than me) to re-write
these as built-in functions ?
Nick
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., (continued)
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Jan D., 2003/01/04
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Nick Roberts, 2003/01/04
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Jan D., 2003/01/04
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Kevin Rodgers, 2003/01/07
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Nick Roberts, 2003/01/07
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Jan D., 2003/01/10
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Nick Roberts, 2003/01/10
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/04
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Nick Roberts, 2003/01/05
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/11
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode.,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/12
Re: Toolbar problems with GDB mode., Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/04