[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: keymap in yank-excluded-properties
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: keymap in yank-excluded-properties |
Date: |
23 Aug 2002 10:55:47 +0900 |
Tak Ota <address@hidden> writes:
> Is it generally a good idea not to copy keymap text property?
Yes
> If majority of you agree that yank normally should not copy keymap
> property, is the following modification to the function
> `remove-yank-excluded-properties' acceptable? The idea is if a
> special text property `yank-preserve-all-properties' exists in the
> region and its value is non-nil then yank will not strip any text
> properties off.
I think a better question is `Should tables (and more importantly,
_parts_ of tables) really remain "active" after yanking?'. It sounds
rather annoying to me for the same reason that yanked keymap properties
usually are.
[BTW, if it's decided that this _is_ a good feature, please call the
property something like `yank-preserved-properties' (actually I'm rather
fond of `yankable-properties') and make it a list of property names or t.]
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.