[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior |
|
Date: |
Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:16:52 -0600 (MDT) |
Could we introduce a new function for that or some way to tell
`expand-file-name' not to do the expansion if the dir is relative ?
In principle this is ok, but why is concat not correct?
In this very limited situation, it ought to be correct as
far as I can tell.
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/09
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/12
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/12
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Andreas Schwab, 2002/08/12
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/13
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/14
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/14
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/15
- Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/15
- `concat' a dir and a file (was: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior ), Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/16
- Re: `concat' a dir and a file (was: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior ), Richard Stallman, 2002/08/17